Connect with us

latest

Tension Rises As Trump, US Lawmakers Move To Punish Nigerian Officials Over ‘Christian Killings’.

Published

on

A growing diplomatic tension is unfolding between Nigeria and the United States as the US Congress moves to deliberate on a bill that could impose sanctions on 12 northern governors, traditional rulers, and senior judges alleged to be complicit in what American lawmakers describe as “Christian genocide” and widespread religious persecution under Nigeria’s Sharia and blasphemy laws.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

According to Nivo News, the move comes on the heels of US President Donald Trump’s recent redesignation of Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern (CPC)” for alleged systemic violations of religious freedom.

Trump, in a post on Truth Social, decried what he termed “mass killings of Christians” in Nigeria and instructed key US lawmakers, including Congressman Riley Moore and Chairman Tom Cole, to launch an immediate investigation into the crisis.

“Thousands of Christians are being killed in Nigeria. Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter. America cannot fold its hands while these atrocities continue,” Trump declared.

The controversy centers on a proposed legislation titled The Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025, sponsored by Republican Senator Ted Cruz. The bill formally classifies Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern and seeks to impose direct sanctions on Nigerian public officials and religious authorities accused of promoting or condoning violence against Christians and other religious minorities.

If passed, the bill mandates the US Secretary of State to compile, within 90 days, a list of Nigerian officials—including governors, judges, and monarchs—believed to have “enacted or maintained blasphemy laws” or “tolerated violence motivated by religion.” Those named would be sanctioned under Executive Order 13818 of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability framework, which includes visa bans, asset freezes, and financial restrictions.

The proposed law specifically targets northern states where Sharia-based penal codes have been adopted since 1999, starting with Zamfara under then-Governor Ahmad Sani Yerima, followed by 11 other states—Kano, Sokoto, Katsina, Bauchi, Borno, Jigawa, Kebbi, Yobe, Kaduna, Niger, and Gombe. These states expanded Sharia’s jurisdiction beyond personal matters to cover criminal offenses and public morality, creating parallel Islamic legal systems alongside secular courts.

Meanwhile, states like Kwara, Kogi, Benue, Nasarawa, Taraba, and Adamawa continue to operate under conventional legal frameworks, limiting Sharia to personal and family-related issues.

Tensions recently escalated when the Supreme Council for Sharia announced its intention to establish offices in Oyo and Ogun States, sparking public uproar and clashes between Muslim and Christian groups. The council later clarified that the proposed offices were merely for arbitration in Muslim-related disputes and not the establishment of Sharia courts.

While defending the bill, Senator Cruz accused Nigerian authorities of institutionalizing discrimination and turning a blind eye to violence against Christians and other religious minorities.

“Religious persecution and violence in Nigeria are endemic. Since 2009, over 52,000 Christians have been murdered, 20,000 churches destroyed, and dozens of villages wiped out. The government has failed to act—and in many cases, it is complicit,” Cruz alleged.

He further argued that the enforcement of Sharia law since 2000 had emboldened extremist groups and legitimized persecution under the guise of religious morality. The bill also condemns Nigeria’s blasphemy laws, which are prevalent in most northern states and have led to several controversial death sentences, including cases involving minors and entertainers accused of “insulting Islam.”


Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

latest

Atiku’s Biggest Political Mistake Was Allowing Obasanjo to Complete Second Term – Okechukwu.

Published

on

A founding member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Osita Okechukwu, has identified what he described as the biggest political mistake made by African Democratic Congress (ADC)....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

Okechukwu argued that Atiku’s biggest political error was allowing former President Olusegun Obasanjo to secure a second term in office.

Atiku, who served as Obasanjo’s deputy, had reportedly nursed a presidential ambition ahead of the 2003 general election but eventually abandoned the plan to allow the former president to seek re-election.

Speaking with journalists on Sunday, Okechukwu highlighted some of what he considered political missteps in Atiku’s quest to become Nigeria’s president.

He said, “Atiku’s third unforced political error appeared to mirror his first in 2003, when he hurried into a presidential ambition rather than exercising patience in the established political tradition of the Fulani I know, by allowing President Olusegun Obasanjo to complete his constitutionally permitted second term.

“The second unforced error was when His Excellency breached Section 7 of the PDP Constitution and the subsisting rotation convention between North and South in 2023.”

The APC chieftain maintained that the ongoing crisis within the ADC offered another lesson on the importance of patience and strategic political engagement.

He argued that effective political strategy goes beyond assembling a political team, stressing the importance of timing, respect for the rule of law, established conventions and conflict management.

Continue Reading

latest

ADC Crisis: Osita Okechukwu Says Nafiu Bala Has Exposed Atiku’s Political Strategy.

Published

on

A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Osita Okechukwu, has said the factional National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Nafiu Bala Gombe, has damaged the widely promoted image of the party’s presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, as a master political strategist.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

Okechukwu made the remark following revelations that Atiku had not contacted Bala amid the leadership crisis rocking the ADC.

Speaking with BBC Radio, Bala disclosed that despite the political crisis within the party, Atiku had never held a meeting with him.

“Atiku hasn’t contacted me even though he comes from my area. I went to court with just the constitution,” Bala said.

He added, “I said to everyone that if they had followed the correct steps, the court would have decided in their favour.

“But if we are correct, then we deserve our rights.”

Reacting to the development while addressing journalists on Sunday, Okechukwu argued that Bala’s revelation had undermined Atiku’s reputation as a skilled political strategist.

According to the APC chieftain, Atiku should have considered it important to privately engage Bala, particularly given their shared political background and family ties.

He said: “You would think that a politician who is always praised by his supporters as a skilled strategist would have seen it as very important to talk to Gombe privately, especially since they share the same local political background and family history.

“It seems strange that Atiku didn’t take such a simple political step, especially when the ADC crisis kept going on, which makes people wonder about the real skill of the so-called master strategist.”

Continue Reading

latest

2027: Forget Party Loyalty, CSOs Tell Nigerians What to Consider Before Voting.

Published

on

Thousands of supporters took to the streets of Potiskum on Sunday as the campaign motorcade of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, passed through the town, attracting a large crowd of men, women and youths.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

REPHRASE THIS……The Network of Civil Society Groups has announced plans to identify and publicly promote credible candidates across political parties ahead of the 2027 general elections, urging Nigerians to prioritise individual competence and integrity over party affiliation.

Advertisement

The group said the initiative would provide voters with information about contestants whose records, leadership qualities and policy proposals demonstrate commitment to democratic values, inclusive representation and public accountability.

In a press statement signed on behalf of the network by Emmanuel Olowu Aiyedun, titled “2027: Supporting Persons, Not Parties; Advancing Democratic Pluralism, Inclusive Representation and Accountability,” the organisation said it aims to encourage issue-based electoral choices, political diversity and effective representation at the federal, state and local government levels.

“The initiative is necessary as Nigerians continue to grapple with economic difficulties, rising living costs and challenges in accessing affordable food, reliable electricity, quality healthcare, education and employment opportunities.”

Recommended

() () ()

The organisation stated that citizens should evaluate political aspirants based on their personal records, integrity, competence, leadership experience, public conduct and proposed policies rather than their political parties.

It warned against blind political loyalty, noting that religious sentiments, ethnic affiliations, financial inducements and longstanding party attachment should not determine electoral decisions.

According to the statement, “While political parties remain important democratic institutions, party affiliation should not replace individual credibility, integrity, character, competence and a demonstrable record of public service.”

“We maintain that allowing candidates from different political parties and ideological backgrounds to participate in governance would strengthen democratic institutions, encourage constructive debates and promote checks and balances.”

As part of its planned activities, the organisation said it would organise civic education programmes, public engagements and discussions to enable voters to examine candidates’ backgrounds, policy proposals and commitments to public service.

It added that selected contestants from different political parties would be featured through candidate engagements, public interviews, policy discussions and media outreach to give Nigerians access to information about their leadership capacity and proposed contributions to governance.

The Network also called on political parties, aspirants, civil society organisations and the media to promote issue-based campaigns.

While urging Nigerians to reject vote-buying, ethnic divisions, religious manipulation and other forms of electoral inducement, it stressed the need for the 2027 elections to produce effective representation and accountable leadership responsive to citizens’ needs.

The Network of Civil Society Groups has unveiled plans to identify and publicly promote credible candidates across political parties ahead of the 2027 general elections, urging Nigerians to consider individual competence and integrity rather than party affiliation when choosing their leaders.

The organisation said the initiative would provide voters with information about candidates whose track records, leadership abilities and policy proposals reflect a commitment to democratic values, inclusive representation and public accountability.

In a press statement signed by Emmanuel Olowu Aiyedun on behalf of the network, titled “2027: Supporting Persons, Not Parties; Advancing Democratic Pluralism, Inclusive Representation and Accountability,” the group said the initiative was designed to promote issue-based voting, political diversity and effective representation at the federal, state and local government levels.

It noted that the initiative had become necessary as Nigerians continued to face economic challenges, rising living costs and difficulties accessing affordable food, reliable electricity, quality healthcare, education and employment opportunities.

The organisation urged citizens to assess political aspirants based on their personal records, integrity, competence, leadership experience, public conduct and proposed policies rather than the parties they represent.

It also cautioned against blind political loyalty, stressing that religious sentiments, ethnic affiliations, financial inducements and longstanding attachment to political parties should not influence electoral decisions.

“While political parties remain important democratic institutions, party affiliation should not replace individual credibility, integrity, character, competence and a demonstrable record of public service,” the statement read.

The network further argued that allowing candidates from different political parties and ideological backgrounds to participate in governance would strengthen democratic institutions, encourage constructive debates and promote checks and balances.

As part of its planned activities, the organisation said it would organise civic education programmes, public engagements and discussions to help voters examine candidates’ backgrounds, policy proposals and commitment to public service.

It added that selected candidates from different political parties would be featured through public engagements, interviews, policy discussions and media outreach to give Nigerians more information about their leadership capacity and proposed contributions to governance.

The Network also called on political parties, aspirants, civil society organisations and media outlets to promote issue-based campaigns ahead of the elections.

It urged Nigerians to reject vote-buying, ethnic divisions, religious manipulation and other forms of electoral inducement, emphasising the need for the 2027 elections to produce effective representation and accountable leadership that responds to citizens’ needs.

Continue Reading

Trending