Connect with us

Politics

Amanze Obi-Seek The Truths Behind-Tinubu’s Election Victory (Full Text)

Published

on

On December 11, I came across the 6th installment of Daily Sun columnist Amanze Obi’s opinions on the recent general election. I was surprised by the misinformation and fallacies presented by the writer regarding why Peter Obi lost and Bola Ahmed Tinubu won. This prompted my search for the 5th edition, which was equally misleading as Amanze attempted, unsuccessfully, to incite Christians against Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima….CONTINUE READING....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

 

 

Amanze packed numerous falsehoods about the election in the articles, warranting attention to prevent the spread of misleading information, especially to the younger, more impressionable audience. Amanze and others should refrain from distorting the story of the last election with revisionist and misleading details.

In attempting to decipher Tinubu’s candidacy, Amanze invented a conspiracy involving northern Muslims demanding a Muslim-Muslim ticket, which was not true. Tinubu contested the primary election against both Christians (Rotimi Amaechi and Yemi Osinbajo) and a Muslim (Ahmad Lawan), with religion not being the focal point. Tinubu won convincingly based on his experience and national network.

Tinubu, a nationalist, did not appeal to religious sentiments during his campaign, unlike opponents who tried to define him solely by his faith. When selecting Kashim Shettima as his running mate, Tinubu prioritized competence, innovation, compassion, integrity, fairness, and excellence over religious considerations.

Contrary to Amanze’s claims, Tinubu’s political strategy worked as reflected in the election results across the six zones. Tinubu’s appeal was not confined to any specific religious or geographical divide.

Amanze’s assertion that Tinubu “roundly lost the Christian South” is inaccurate. Tinubu won the South-West and had a significant presence in the South-South states, demonstrating his broad appeal. The only region where Tinubu faced resistance was the South-East, which had specific reasons for its voting pattern.

In the second part of Amanze’s article, he continues to propagate the falsehood that Peter Obi, not Bola Tinubu, won the election. Obi lost, and the supposed popular impression of his victory was generated by his supporters, not the reality of Nigeria’s electoral map.

Amanze should refrain from spreading fantasies about the last election; Tinubu won it fair and square. The election result was unexpected but showcased Tinubu’s ability to secure votes across various states and regions.

Amanze’s disappointment should not lead him to engage in election fortune-telling; instead, he should acknowledge the hard facts and realities of the electoral process.

*Onanuga is Special Adviser to President Tinubu on Information & Strategy

Advertisement

latest

‘Just Following Orders’: ICPC Defends Controversial Detention Of El-Rufai!.

Published

on

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has firmly defended its prosecution and detention of former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, dismissing allegations of political bias. ICPC spokesperson John Odey stated that the commission is acting strictly under court-ordered mandates and remains unfazed by the El-Rufai Support Group Association’s (ERSGA) decision to hire a Washington-based advocacy firm, Vanguard Africa, to challenge the proceedings internationally.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

The ERSGA, which maintains the former governor’s innocence, argues that the legal actions against him represent a troubling trend of weaponizing due process to sideline opposition figures ahead of the 2027 elections. In response, the ICPC reiterated that it is a non-political, law-enforcement body that pursues corruption allegations—including those against high-profile figures—solely based on its governing Act and judicial authorization. El-Rufai currently faces separate charges from both the ICPC and the Department of State Services (DSS) regarding allegations of financial impropriety and unauthorized communications surveillance.

  • ICPC Position: The commission maintains that its detention of Nasir El-Rufai is entirely lawful, authorized by a court remand order, and devoid of political motivation.

  • International Challenge: The El-Rufai Support Group Association (ERSGA) has engaged Washington-based Vanguard Africa to lobby U.S. officials and institutions, claiming the case reflects a broader erosion of the rule of law in Nigeria.

  • Commission’s Response: ICPC spokesperson John Odey dismissed the international advocacy effort, emphasizing that the agency follows statutory procedures regardless of an individual’s political status.

  • The Charges: El-Rufai faces ongoing legal action from the ICPC over alleged fraud and abuse of office, as well as separate charges from the DSS regarding alleged communication wiretapping.

Option 3: Analytical Overview

The legal entanglement of former Kaduna Governor Nasir El-Rufai has escalated into an international dispute. While the ICPC asserts that it is merely performing its statutory duties—citing a court remand order as the basis for its custody of the former governor—his supporters have characterized the move as a political crackdown.

By retaining the Washington-based firm Vanguard Africa, the El-Rufai Support Group Association is attempting to bring international scrutiny to Nigeria’s judicial processes, framing the prosecution as a symptom of a systemic threat to the nation’s democratic health. Conversely, the ICPC maintains that its operations are neutral and strictly bound by the anti-graft Act, viewing the international outreach as an external matter that does not impact their commitment to prosecuting alleged financial crimes and misconduct.

Would you like me to focus this rephrasing on a specific audience, such as a formal report or a social media update?

Continue Reading

latest

Judiciary Under Fire: Momodu Demands Ruthless Purge Of Judges Issuing ‘Rascally’ Rulings!.

Published

on

Dele Momodu, a prominent member of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), recently declared that the judiciary must be prevented from sabotaging Nigeria’s democratic stability. Speaking on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily, Momodu’s comments followed a Federal High Court ruling by Justice Peter Lifu, which ordered INEC to deregister the ADC and several other parties. The Court of Appeal subsequently stayed the execution of this ruling, labeling the initial judgment as the “highest form of judicial impertinence”.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

Momodu advocated for formal sanctions against judges who issue what he termed “rascally judgments,” arguing that judicial officers who ignore established legal procedures or orders from superior courts must face accountability to preserve public trust in the rule of law.

In a separate discussion on the Naija Unfiltered Podcast, Momodu revealed that he had previously encouraged Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), to form a political alliance with former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. Momodu noted that he urged Obi to work with Atiku—who originally helped elevate Obi to national prominence—by citing historical examples of leaders who ascended to the presidency after serving as deputies, such as former Ghanaian President John Mahama, Goodluck Jonathan, and U.S. President Joe Biden.

However, Momodu stated that Obi rejected this advice, maintaining that his own popularity surpassed that of the former Vice President. Momodu also recounted that when Atiku selected Obi as his running mate for the 2019 election, he remained steadfast in his choice despite significant opposition from party governors.

Continue Reading

latest

Kwankwaso Fires Back! Opposition Brews Within NDC Over Controversial New Policy!.

Published

on

Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) vice-presidential candidate, has publicly endorsed the party’s new anti-defection indemnity form, calling it a positive step for the organization. Speaking through the Kwankwasiyya movement’s spokesperson, Habibu Saleh Mohammed, Kwankwaso emphasized that this policy is essential for fostering internal discipline and upholding the constitutional mandate linked to party-sponsored elected officials.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

The NDC implemented this loyalty affidavit specifically to curb the trend of elected representatives abandoning the party that secured their victory. Party National Chairman, Moses Cleopas, explained that this initiative is a direct response to the persistent issue of politicians defecting after utilizing a party’s platform to achieve office.

Kwankwaso’s camp maintains that this requirement aligns with the spirit of the Nigerian Constitution, which discourages officials from deserting their sponsoring parties. “What the party is trying to do is only imposing the position of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. To a larger extent, this is what we’ve been talking about,” Mohammed stated.

Mohammed further noted that the Kwankwasiyya movement is no stranger to the damage caused by defections, citing the departure of former Kano State governor Abdullahi Ganduje as a prime example. Ultimately, the movement believes this new NDC measure will prevent politicians from viewing party platforms merely as temporary vehicles for electoral success.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 NIVONEWS