latest
Tinubu Must Go’ Meeting: Kano Police Reveal Why Protesters Were Blocked
The Kano State Commissioner of Police, Bakori, has explained why the command prevented members of the ‘Tinubu Must Go’ movement from accessing a venue booked for their meeting, saying advance notification would have helped officers make adequate security arrangements.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶
Bakori acknowledged that the organisers had the right to assemble but argued that notifying the police beforehand would have enabled the command to prepare for the event, which was expected to attract about 700 participants.
The commissioner spoke in an interview with DCL Hausa following allegations by the movement’s convener, Abba Hikima, who accused police officers of blocking members from entering their meeting venue on Sunday.
In a live video posted on his verified Facebook page, Hikima claimed that about 10 mobile police vehicles had been deployed to the private location booked for the gathering.
“They have been stationed here in order to prevent us from accessing the private venue which we paid for; we are to gather here to exercise our civic rights… This is even the more reason why Tinubu must go,” he said.
The lawyer insisted that the organisers were not required to obtain police permission before holding the meeting. He also accused the police leadership of allowing political considerations to influence its responsibilities.
“The Court of Appeal decision stands. I do not need to inform any security agent to hold my rallies. Next time, we are going to protest; Next time we are going to demonstrate; next time we are going to hit the ground,” Hikima added.
In his response, Bakori said he contacted the convener on Saturday night after coming across information about the planned gathering on social media.
“What happened is that, in the first place, it is their right to come and organise their gathering. Nobody will stop them, and the law does not require them to inform us. However, notifying us is important because it allows us to regulate the event and ensure there is no tension, that nobody attacks them and that they do not engage in any activity in Kano that can constitute an offence,” the commissioner said.
Bakori disclosed that he asked Hikima to postpone the meeting and visit the command so they could discuss the programme and the security measures required.
“I asked him to postpone the meeting and come so we could discuss the matter. He said he would consult others and get back to me. I called him several times afterwards, but he did not answer,” he stated.
The commissioner said the expected turnout made it necessary for the police to understand the identities of those attending and the arrangements for the event.
“If 700 people are coming into Kano, we need to know the details. This is not the first time political groups from different parties have organised activities in the state. They usually write to us, and we provide security for them,” he explained.
When asked whether the command had intelligence suggesting that some of the expected participants had criminal records, Bakori referred to an incident in Sabon Gari about two weeks earlier.
According to him, some individuals who claimed to have travelled to Kano for political activities were found in possession of weapons.
“Two weeks ago, some people came to Sabon Gari claiming they were there for political activities. We seized weapons, arrested some of them, and we are still investigating the matter,” he said.
Bakori maintained that the incident contributed to the command’s concerns about another large gathering whose organisers had not provided sufficient details.
“We were concerned about another gathering that was expected to attract about 700 people. We did not know who they were or where they would stay. We need to protect them and the residents of the state. That is what happened,” he added.
He insisted that the disagreement could be resolved through discussions with the organisers, stressing that the police were concerned about the safety of participants and other residents.
The commissioner also dismissed allegations that the command acted on behalf of a political party, maintaining that the intervention was aimed at preventing a breakdown of law and order.
“There is nothing political about this. It is about understanding the situation and protecting the people of Kano State and Nigeria,” he said.
Bakori further stated that the police had previously provided security for events organised by Hikima whenever the command was informed in advance.
“We do not prevent people from organising events. Even he has informed us about their activities on several occasions, and we provided security, ensuring that the events ended peacefully,” he stated.
He urged the organisers to communicate with the command ahead of future gatherings to allow officers to make the necessary security arrangements.
“Our advice is that he should have informed us so we could provide security for the organisers and the people of Kano State. We are all working for the people,” Bakori added.
latest
Tension In Kano As ‘Tinubu Must Go’ Movement Alleges Police Interference
Members of the ‘Tinubu Must Go’ movement have protested the alleged obstruction of their meeting by police officers in Kano State, accusing security personnel of preventing them from accessing a venue they had hired for the gathering.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶
Abba Hikima, a lawyer and convener of the movement, alleged that officers blocked participants from entering the private venue on Sunday, October 11, 2026.
The movement describes itself as a non-partisan platform seeking to mobilise Nigerians to vote President Bola Tinubu out of office in the 2027 general elections. It says its campaign is driven by economic policies that it believes have increased hardship across the country.
In a live video shared on his verified Facebook page, Hikima claimed that about 10 mobile police vehicles had been deployed to the venue.
Several police officers could be seen in the background as he addressed viewers while wearing a shirt and fez cap bearing the movement’s inscription.
“Today, the 11th of October 2026, we gathered here in Kano State in order to exercise our fundamental human rights and to associate freely in order to exchange ideas and educate ourselves on the need to send away the administration of Bola Ahmed Tinubu in Nigeria,” he said.
Hikima accused the police of preventing the group from holding what he described as a peaceful gathering, insisting that the organisers had done nothing wrong.
“They have been stationed here in order to prevent us from accessing the private venue which we paid for; we are to gather here to exercise our civic rights… This is even the more reason why Tinubu must go,” he said.
He added: “We are not criminals, we are not thugs, we are not hooligans and we have not committed any offence. And there is nothing wrong with what we are doing right now.”
The convener disclosed that Kano State Commissioner of Police, Ibrahim Bakori, contacted him on Saturday and questioned why the organisers had not notified the command about the planned meeting.
According to Hikima, he explained to the commissioner that the event would take place within an enclosed premises and that attendees intended to conduct themselves peacefully.
“I want to say it clearly that yesterday the Kano State Commissioner of Police, Ibrahim Bakori, called me on the phone and told me that courtesy demands that I inform them of this meeting. I said, ‘Sir, our meeting is going to be in an enclosed environment within a perimeter and we are going to be civil, we are lawyers’,” he stated.
Hikima maintained that the group was not required to obtain police approval before exercising its right to assemble. He cited constitutional provisions protecting freedom of expression, association and personal liberty.
“This is our understanding and the law has given us the right, under section 39 of the Constitution, to exchange ideas and opinions,” he said.
“And we have the right, under section 40, to associate and we have the personal liberty, under section 35, to do this.”
The lawyer further alleged that one of the officers objected to participants wearing clothing bearing the ‘Tinubu Must Go’ slogan.
“One of them even told me that they have no problem with us but we just shouldn’t wear this insignia; But I say We must wear this,” he said.
Reaffirming the movement’s position, Hikima argued that the slogan represented political expression and vowed that members would continue organising rallies and demonstrations.
“The Court of Appeal decision stands. I do not need to inform any security agent to hold my rallies. Next time, we are going to protest; Next time we are going to demonstrate; next time we are going to hit the ground,” he added.
Participants at the gathering were heard chanting, “Tinubu Must Go.”
latest
Man City Silence Anfield With Stunning 3-0 Demolition Of Liverpool.
Manchester City recorded an impressive 3-0 victory over Liverpool at Anfield on October 11, with goals from Erling Haaland, Jeremy Doku and Rayan Cherki handing Liverpool their first defeat under manager Andoni Iraola.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶
City strengthened their position in the Premier League encounter after Liverpool midfielder Ryan Gravenberch was sent off for a second bookable offence, allowing the visitors to take advantage of their numerical superiority and secure all three points.
The match also took place amid controversy over Manchester City’s alleged breaches of Premier League financial regulations. Liverpool supporters expressed their anger by displaying a banner that read, “a generation of supporters cheated.”
Both teams struggled to create clear scoring opportunities during a largely uneventful first half. Liverpool’s Alexis Mac Allister attempted an overhead kick, while Manchester City goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma comfortably saved a long-range effort from Victor Munoz.
City also found it difficult to break through Liverpool’s defence. Alisson Becker collected Enzo Fernandez’s attempt before Cherki fired wide following a promising run down the right flank.
Liverpool returned from the break with renewed determination and created three chances within the opening five minutes of the second half. Donnarumma produced saves to deny Lewis Koumas and Gravenberch, while Mac Allister narrowly missed the target with another attempt.
Haaland then squandered an opportunity to give City the lead, shooting wide after being set up by Antoine Semenyo. Liverpool’s hopes suffered another setback when Gravenberch was dismissed following a collision with Doku.
Manchester City took advantage of the extra space, with Haaland breaking the deadlock. A deflected cross from Doku fell into the path of the Norwegian striker, who finished first-time beyond Alisson.
Doku extended City’s advantage six minutes later. The winger cut inside from the left before unleashing a superb right-footed strike into the top corner, leaving Alisson with little chance of making a save.
Cherki sealed the emphatic victory in the 78th minute, calmly slotting the ball past Alisson after linking up with Elliot Anderson and Joško Gvardiol in a well-coordinated attacking move.
Speaking to Sky Sports after the match, Manchester City manager Enzo Maresca praised his players for overcoming the challenging atmosphere at Anfield.
He said: “Very difficult circumstances, difficult environment. We struggled in the first half; we were on the ball but not so much off the ball. Second half we made some adjustments, and we were much better.”
Maresca also emphasised the need for his team to remain composed amid hostile reactions from away supporters, noting that such pressure would accompany them throughout their away fixtures.
“We need to learn how to deal with the noise because the noise will be with us at all of our away games, there will be noise. We need to deal with that and make our noise. Our noise is to win games,” he added.
Addressing the controversy surrounding Manchester City’s financial case, Maresca said he preferred to concentrate on matters within his control.
“I can not control things outside football, so why stress? I stress about game plan, day-by-day training sessions, but the rest it’s not in my hands,” he stated.
latest
INEC Candidate List Controversy: PDP Reveals Next Line Of Action Ahead Of 2027 Polls.
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has assured its members that it is working to resolve the exclusion of some of its candidates from the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) final list for the 2027 elections.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶
The spokesperson for the PDP faction loyal to Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike, Jungudo Mohammed, disclosed this in a statement issued on Sunday.
Mohammed said the party was engaging with INEC over the matter in line with the law and established electoral guidelines. He added that further information would be made available as developments unfold.
He also urged affected candidates, party members and supporters to remain calm and avoid actions or public statements that could jeopardise the ongoing discussions with the electoral commission.
“The PDP therefore assures all concerned that it is treating this development with the utmost seriousness it deserves and will communicate further developments as appropriate. The Party is committed to ensuring that all legitimate concerns are properly addressed with the Commission,” the statement read.
Some of the PDP candidates reportedly omitted from INEC’s final list include Isa Pantami of Gombe State and Ladi Adebutu of Ogun State.
Meanwhile, INEC has disclosed that it is reviewing a recent Supreme Court judgment on certain provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 that could affect candidates’ eligibility ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The commission’s position was made public on Tuesday by its chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan, during a press conference on preparations for the forthcoming elections.
The Supreme Court had affirmed the validity of Sections 77 and 84 of the Electoral Act 2026, as amended, concerning eligibility to participate in party primaries. The ruling followed appeals filed by the Zenith Labour Party (ZLP) and the Social Democratic Party (SDP).
The judgment has triggered fresh uncertainty over the status of some politicians who defected to other parties after failing to secure tickets from the parties they previously belonged to.
The ongoing review and discussions with INEC are expected to determine how the judgment affects the affected candidates ahead of the 2027 elections.
-
latest1 year ago“Social Media Erupts As Jim Iyke Declares Rita Dominic Nollywood’s Most Beautiful”
-
latest3 years agoEdo Political Showdown: Oshiomhole Appears At Presidential Villa As Tinubu Hands APC Gubernatorial Flag To Okpebholo (Photos & Video)
-
entertainment3 years agoLove Knows No Age American Woman Defends Marriage To Young Nigerian Man “I’m Not 70”
-
latest3 years agoOlumide Akpata Strikes Again: Drops Killer Track, Sends Edo State Into Frenzy!(Video)
-
Politics3 years agoNigerians React As Pastor Adeboye Foresees Passing Away On A Sunday After Enjoying A Satisfying Meal Of Pounded Yam
-
latest2 years agoFG Identifies 31 States At Risk Of Heavy Flooding In 2024: See Full List
-
Politics3 years agoBREAKING: Inspector-General Of Police Summons Top Police Commanders For Crucial-Security Challenges
-
latest3 years ago5 NYSC Corpers Perish In Fatal Road Accident Returning From Camp
