Connect with us

latest

SHOCK OMISSION: Arokodare Banished From Wolves Matchday Squad After Explosive Training Ground Row!.

Published

on

  • Session Cancelled: According to journalist Nathan Judah, training was called off after Arokodare allegedly refused to leave the pitch when told he could not train with the squad under manager Cesar Peixoto [cite: According to journalist Nathan Judah, Wolves were forced to cancel a first-team training session after Tolu Arokodare allegedly refused to leave the pitch when instructed not to train with the squad., Judah wrote: “Understand Wolves training was cancelled yesterday following Tolu Arokodare’s refusal to leave the pitch when asked not to train with squad. Cesar Peixoto seemingly not tolerating ‘player power’ & poor discipline levels.].....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

    • Increased Security: Security was tightened the following day to ensure Arokodare was not present at the training facility.

    Background and Transfer Situation

    • Difficult Debut Season: Following a €26 million transfer from KRC Genk, the 25-year-old scored only three Premier League goals in 33 matches as Wolves suffered relegation.

    • Previous Discipline: His campaign was earlier marred by an April dressing-room altercation with teammate Mateus Mane after a 4-0 loss to West Ham United.

    • Exit Intentions: Having already been excluded from the Portugal pre-season camp and facing competition from Raul Jimenez, Arokodare has expressed his desire to leave [cite: Peixoto had already signalled the striker was no longer central to his plans by leaving him out of Wolves’ pre-season training camp in Portugal. The return of experienced forward Raul Jimenez has further reduced his chances of regular football., Arokodare has informed Wolves that he wants to leave this summer].

    • Interested Suitors: While Trabzonspor’s bid was rejected because the player prefers a top-five European league, Fiorentina has submitted an improved loan proposal with a €22 million option to buy, alongside ongoing interest from Genoa [cite: Fiorentina are said to have submitted an improved loan proposal that includes a €22 million option to buy, while Genoa remain interested. Turkish side Trabzonspor previously had a bid accepted, but the Nigeria international rejected the move as he wants to remain in one of Europe’s top five leagues.]. However, talks have stalled as Wolves seek over €20 million to recover their initial investment.

    FIFA Regulations Context

    • Player Protection Rules: The situation unfolds amidst updated FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (specifically Article 17), which prohibit clubs from isolating contracted players to force transfers and mandate first-team training access barring legitimate sporting or medical reasons [cite: The dispute also comes at a time when FIFA has introduced revised player protection rules under the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players., The changes, particularly those relating to Article 17, are aimed at preventing clubs from isolating contracted players to force transfers. Under the updated rules, players should continue training with the first team unless there is a legitimate sporting or medical reason for their exclusion.].

    • Potential Penalties: Violations can lead to FIFA-imposed financial fines, transfer bans, sporting sanctions, or even contract termination allowing the player to leave without a transfer fee.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

latest

Hope Alive: FIFA Drops Crucial Guidelines To Rescue Super Eagles’ World Cup Hopes.

Published

on

According to FIFA, Nigeria possesses the talent necessary to secure a spot in the 2030 FIFA World Cup, provided the nation establishes a more stable football infrastructure. In an evaluation released on its website on July 22, the governing body noted that Nigeria’s primary obstacle is now achieving consistent, high-level performance rather than a shortage of raw ability.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

Historically, the Super Eagles have advanced to the Round of 16 in three out of their six World Cup appearances (1994, 1998, and 2014), though they missed the previous two tournaments. Their bid for the 2026 World Cup concluded after finishing second to South Africa in Group C of the CAF qualifiers, which moved them into the second round for the intercontinental play-off spot. Under coach Eric Chelle, the team overcame Gabon with a 4-1 victory after extra time, but ultimately missed qualification after losing a penalty shootout to the Democratic Republic of Congo following a 1-1 draw.

Despite these recent disappointments, FIFA maintains that Nigeria’s vast talent pipeline gives them enormous potential. Ultimately, securing a berth at the 2030 tournament will depend less on raw capability and more on building a strong, reliable organizational framework.

Continue Reading

latest

Legal Fireworks: INEC Challenges Emeka Ike’s Multi-Billion Naira Suit With Shocking Claims.

Published

on

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has informed the Federal High Court in Abuja that the voter details underlying a ₦10 billion fundamental rights lawsuit brought by Nollywood actor and House of Representatives hopeful Emeka Ike are neither classified nor confidential. INEC asserted that the information was published in accordance with the Electoral Act 2026, noting that the commission holds constitutional authority to make voter data public for scrutiny without requiring prior permission from registered voters.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

This position was detailed in a counter-affidavit opposing Ike’s suit, designated as FHC/ABJ/CS/1272/2026, which names both INEC and Lere Olayinka, the media aide to the FCT Minister, as defendants over the online sharing of Ike’s voter registration details on X. Ike’s legal counsel, Leonard Adeh, argued that sharing this data without consent violated the actor’s privacy and data protection rights, prompting a demand for ₦10 billion in damages.

In his own counter-affidavit filed via lawyer Akpama Ekwe, Olayinka rejected claims of unlawful publication, asserting that the shared material—consisting solely of Ike’s name and passport photo—was already publicly accessible and that he owed no duty of confidentiality. Olayinka contended that a political candidate cannot claim distress from the circulation of information voluntarily given during the electoral process, pointing to Section 19(1) of the Electoral Act 2026, which mandates the public display and publication of the voters’ register.

INEC’s counter-affidavit, deposed by Anthonia Makwe, an Assistant Director and Data Protection Officer, emphasized that the commission’s statutory duties involve managing, publishing, and certifying the voters’ register under the Constitution, the Electoral Act 2026, and the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023. INEC reiterated that the data in question is not sensitive or confidential, denied that the specific document published by Olayinka originated from the commission, and maintained that it has fully upheld its obligations to secure voters’ personal information.

The presiding judge has adjourned the case to October 12, 2026, for the continuation of the hearing.

Continue Reading

latest

Severe Setback! Judge Crushes Sowore’s Bid In Dramatic Tinubu Defamation Showdown.

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Abuja has blocked an attempt by Omoyele Sowore to introduce uncertified documents into his defamation trial concerning statements made against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

Justice Mohammed Garuba Umar made the ruling on Wednesday after Sowore’s defense team attempted to submit the papers via a lawyer, Wayne Chikezie Elijah. The documents included a summary of testimony from a witness known as “XYZ” and various letters.

The Department of State Services (DSS) objected to the move, arguing that the papers were public documents and legally required certification to ensure their authenticity, as they had been in private legal custody. Justice Umar sided with the DSS, questioning how the court could guarantee the integrity of documents that had remained with a lawyer. Consequently, the judge rejected the application and ordered the documents marked accordingly.

Earlier in the proceedings, DSS witness Uwen Davis testified that he authored a letter to X Corporation requesting the removal of a post in which Sowore allegedly labeled President Tinubu a criminal, warning it could provoke unrest. However, during cross-examination, Davis admitted he authored the letter under orders and could not specifically identify the supporters mentioned in the correspondence.

Justice Umar adjourned the defense hearing to July 28. At a prior hearing, the judge had warned Sowore to begin his defense or forfeit his right to do so. Sowore denies the defamation charges, and the trial is ongoing.

Continue Reading

Trending