Connect with us

Latest News

Tribunal Ruling Sparks PDP’s Strong Disapproval Citing Removal Of Federal Lawmakers

Published

on

Tribunal Ruling Sparks PDP’s Strong Disapproval Citing Removal Of Federal Lawmakers....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

The Plateau chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has expressed its disapproval of the verdict delivered by the National Assembly election petitions tribunal, which awarded the Plateau South Senate seat to Simon Lalong.

Speaking to reporters in Jos, PDP Chairman Chris Hassan rejected the tribunal’s ruling on Tuesday. The tribunal, led by Justice M. B. Tukur, declared Mr. Lalong as the victor of the February 25 national assembly elections and nullified Peter Gyendeng’s election in the Riyom-Barkin Ladi federal constituency, declaring Fom Dalyop of the Labour Party, who finished second, as the winner.

Read Also Nigeria’s Education Minister Calls For Comprehensive Reform Of Tertiary Education System

Both Gyendeng and Dalyop had approached the tribunal to contest the victories of Napoleon Bali and Gyendeng, who were members of the PDP and had won the senatorial and House of Representatives seats, respectively.

The tribunal’s decision to overturn the results was based on the petitioners’ argument that they had been wrongly nominated since the PDP lacked a valid structure at the time they were selected as its candidates.

PDP Chairman Chris Hassan voiced his dissatisfaction, stating, “The PDP watched with dismay and trepidation the nullification of the elections of our senator representing Plateau South and House of Representatives member representing Barkin Ladi-Riyom federal constituency.” He further stated, “We reject the outcome of the judgment in its entirety because justice was not served, and it did not reflect the law and the interest of the majority of the people as freely expressed at the election.”

Hassan continued, “The judgment was an electoral robbery, which is unacceptable to the people of Plateau because it is contrary to the will of the people of the constituencies, which was freely expressed via the votes we got in the election.”

He maintained that the tribunal made an error by relying on the internal disputes within the PDP to make its ruling in favor of the petitioners. He explained that the party had since complied with the judgment of Justice S.P. Gang and conducted a new congress, asserting that the party now possesses a “solid and valid structure.”

Hassan also criticized the tribunal’s decision, stating that it lacked even a trace of justice. He described the judgments as a distortion of the clear intentions and choices of the people, especially in light of the recent consolidated judgments delivered by the presidential election petition tribunal.

Advertisement
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

latest

PDP Headquarters Showdown: Court Adjourns Turaki-Wike Dispute Amid Allegations Of Bias.

Published

on

The leadership tussle within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) escalated on Friday at the Federal High Court in Abuja as the faction led by Kabiru Turaki (SAN) filed a motion requesting Justice Joyce Abdulmalik to recuse herself from hearing the case.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

The case, tagged FHC/ABJ/CS/2501/2025, challenges the validity of the PDP National Convention held in Ibadan, Oyo State. Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the main suit and related applications to January 14, 2026.

The recusal motion, brought forward by a group of seven Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs) led by Chief Chris Uche on behalf of former Acting National Chairman Ambassador Umar Damagum and other convention-elected officers, alleges bias in the handling of the suit. The applicants cited a “reasonable and well-founded apprehension of likelihood of bias” in the judge’s previous rulings.

The Turaki faction had earlier petitioned the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, requesting that Justice Abdulmalik and two other judges not be assigned cases involving internal PDP disputes due to “past conduct and perceived partisanship,” but the matter was still assigned to her.

They further contended that although the judge denied an ex parte motion filed by the Wike-aligned faction, she issued an ex parte order on November 25, 2025, against their group. The order allegedly restricted their actions on behalf of the party and mirrored a prior order issued by Justice Omotosho in a related PDP matter. They argued that the ex parte decision, lacking urgency, impacted the core substance of the case and undermined their constitutional right to a fair hearing.

The court, however, deemed the recusal motion premature, noting that some parties had not been formally served. Accordingly, proceedings for both the pending applications and the substantive suit were adjourned to January 14, 2026.

The Wike-aligned faction, through plaintiffs Mohammed Abdulrahman (Acting National Chairman) and Senator Samuel Anyanwu (National Secretary), seeks to nullify the Ibadan convention and its resolutions, restrain the Turaki-led officers from representing the PDP, prevent INEC recognition of the Turaki faction, and direct security agencies to protect their access to the party headquarters at Wadata Plaza and Legacy House.

A related counter suit filed by the Turaki faction, FHC/ABJ/CS/2520/2025, requesting an order for police withdrawal from Wadata Plaza, was also adjourned until January 16, 2026.


Continue Reading

latest

From Hope To Controversy: Cancer Patient Rejects Standard Care, Stirs Heated Public Debate.

Published

on

A Nigerian cancer patient, widely recognized on social media as AuntieEsther, has sparked widespread discussion after declining a medically recommended blood transfusion, citing her faith as a Jehovah’s Witness. Her decision comes despite over ₦30 million raised through public donations to support her treatment, coordinated by charity advocate Wisdom Obi-Dickson, known on as @Wizarab10.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

As of December 1, 2025, Obi-Dickson confirmed that ₦30.7 million had been contributed for AuntieEsther’s care. Recent medical updates indicate that her cancer remains localized to her breast and armpit. In a social media post, AuntieEsther thanked Nigerians for their support and shared that she and her family had chosen to pursue injections and nutritional interventions to boost her blood, delaying chemotherapy until her blood count improves. “The doctor accepts my decision and will follow me,” she stated, emphasizing her respect for differing opinions while upholding her religious beliefs.

Obi-Dickson revealed that AuntieEsther’s church had warned her that accepting a blood transfusion could result in disciplinary action, including possible disfellowship. He explained that doctors presented two options: a standard treatment involving a transfusion within budget, or a more expensive alternative that aligned with her faith. AuntieEsther opted for the latter, fully aware that it would extend treatment and increase costs.

The decision has generated mixed reactions. Some Nigerians argue that public funds were intended to save her life and question the ethics of supporting a choice that could endanger it. Social media users have called for the donations to be returned or redirected to others in need. Reality TV personality Natacha Akide, known as Simply Tacha, described the situation as “pure madness,” expressing disbelief over the refusal of potentially life-saving care.

Despite the controversy, Obi-Dickson has maintained transparency regarding the funds raised, providing receipts for ₦74,000 spent on AuntieEsther’s preferred food, leaving a balance of ₦30,776,252 as of December 1, 2025. He thanked the public for their continued generosity and support.


Continue Reading

latest

Malami Denies Terrorism Financing Allegations, Defends Integrity And Record.

Published

on

Former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, has strongly denied any involvement in terrorism financing, responding to recent claims that linked him to such activities. The allegations followed a report that suggested two individuals arrested in a counter-terrorism investigation had connections to Malami and other prominent Nigerians.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

In a statement shared on his Facebook page, Malami, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), stressed that neither Nigerian nor international authorities have ever accused, investigated, or charged him in connection with terrorism financing. He clarified that the primary source cited in the report did not implicate him and described the claims as a misrepresentation of his role.

Malami’s tenure under the Muhammadu Buhari administration as AGF had previously attracted scrutiny over the handling of investigations into terrorism financing. In May 2021, he announced that probes had identified several high-profile Nigerians and businessmen allegedly involved in financing terrorism, assuring that these individuals would be prosecuted. However, the identities of these suspects were not publicly disclosed, and prosecutions did not appear to have occurred before the administration ended in 2023.

The former AGF’s recent public profile has also been shaped by reports of his questioning by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) regarding alleged mismanagement of national funds, including parts of the Abacha loot. Malami was invited for questioning on November 28, 2025, and later released on administrative bail, denying all allegations and facing no charges related to the EFCC investigation.

Defending his record, Malami highlighted his contributions to strengthening Nigeria’s anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CFT) framework. He cited his role in the passage and implementation of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, which enhanced Nigeria’s legal framework against terrorism and updated penalties for related offenses. He noted that these reforms were later evaluated by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and contributed to Nigeria’s removal from the FATF grey list.

Malami urged media outlets to practice responsible reporting on national security matters, emphasizing that his official engagements with various stakeholders during his tenure were consistent with the law and did not indicate any criminal involvement. He cautioned against allegations that could harm reputations and erode public confidence in state institutions, reiterating his commitment to advancing justice and security in Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 NIVONEWS

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x